Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: 12th Volume
Editor(s): U. M. Cowgill, L. R. Williams
34 papers debate the merits of test development, animal and plant culture, nutrition and testing, and the lack of interagency harmony. Papers are divided into the following categories:
Benefits of Interagency Harmonization of Methodology
Review of Common Modes of Toxic Action
Field Techniques
Interpretation of Microcosm Data
Quality Assurance in Ecotoxicity Testing
Sediment Toxicity Testing
Culturing and Testing of New Organisms
Nutrition and Testing
Target Toxicant Analysis
Table of Contents
UM Cowgill
W Horwitz
LR Williams
IT Show, MB Show, LR Williams
EH Smith, HC Bailey
JA Bantle, DJ Fort, DA Dawson
SP Bradbury, RW Carlson, TR Henry
WG Landis, RS Anderson, NA Chester, HD Durst, MV Haley, DW Johnson, RM Tauber
GJ Thorpe, JD Costlow
IC Felkner, B Worthy, T Christison, C Chaisson, J Kurtz, PJ Wyatt
TW Schultz
JF Hobson, JW Sherman, MA Palmieri
JR Clark
JR Voshell, RJ Layton, SW Hiner
LL Conquest, FB Taub
PJ Sheehan
FS Stay, TE Flum, LJ Shannon, JD Yount
MC Harrass, PG Sayre
LJ Shannon, TE Flum, RL Anderson, JD Yount
AL Korndoerfer
KM Jop
PT Heitmuller, JR Clark
KMS Sundaram
KJ Scott, MS Redmond
RJ Breteler, KJ Scott, SP Shepherd
PF Landrum, WR Faust, BJ Eadie
WL Goodfellow, WJ Rue
CL Missimer, DP Lemarie, WJ Rue
WL McCulloch, WJ Rue
KI Keating, PB Caffrey, KA Schultz
UM Cowgill, DP Milazzo
FM Gersich, DP Milazzo, BD Landenberger
SH Ward
P Léger, DA Bengtson, P Sorgeloos
JM Van Emon