Standard Active Last Updated: Oct 24, 2025 Track Document
ASTM E3480/E3480M-25

Standard Test Method for Evaluating Aerial Response Robot Capabilities: Land and Takeoff

Standard Test Method for Evaluating Aerial Response Robot Capabilities: Land and Takeoff E3480_E3480M-25 ASTM|E3480_E3480M-25|en-US Standard Test Method for Evaluating Aerial Response Robot Capabilities: Land and Takeoff Standard new BOS Vol. 15.08 Committee E54
$ 80.00 In stock
ASTM International

Significance and Use

5.1 This test method is part of an overall suite of related test methods that provide repeatable measures of robotic system maneuverability. The ability of an aerial robot to land and takeoff in varied environments increases its utility and survivability for various missions that may be performed in outdoor, indoor, damaged, and contested environments. Relevant operations that can benefit from the ability to land and takeoff from a variety of environments include perching for reconnaissance and observation, payload delivery, and emergency landings. The horizontal and vertical confinement conditions represent the relevant environmental conditions when operating within dwellings with hallways and rooms or warehouses.

5.2 The horizontal and vertical confinement conditions represent the relevant environmental conditions when operating within dwellings with hallways and rooms or warehouses.

5.3 The test apparatuses are low-cost and easy to fabricate so they can be widely replicated. The procedure is also simple to conduct. This eases comparisons across various testing locations and dates to determine best-in-class systems and remote pilots.

5.4 Evaluation—This test method can be used in a controlled environment to measure baseline capabilities.

5.5 Procurement—This test method can be used to identify inherent capability trade-offs in systems, make informed purchasing decisions, and verify performance during acceptance testing. This aligns requirement specifications and user expectations with existing capability limits.

5.6 Innovation—This test method can be used to inspire technical innovation, demonstrate break-through capabilities, and measure the reliability of systems performing specific tasks within an overall mission sequence. Combining or sequencing multiple test methods can guide manufacturers toward implementing the combinations of capabilities necessary to perform essential mission tasks.

Scope

1.1 This test method is intended for remotely operated aerial response robots (that is, unmanned aerial systems (UAS), drones, unmanned aircrafts) operating in complex, unstructured, and often hazardous environments. It specifies the apparatuses, procedures, and performance metrics necessary to measure the robot’s capability to land and takeoff under various environmental conditions (for example, uneven ground, nearby obstructions), which may be inhibited by built-in safety check functionality or stabilization issues. This is intended for VTOL (vertical takeoff and land) systems, and reflects scenarios they may encounter or have to overcome during landing and takeoff actions. This test method is one of several robot tests that can be used to evaluate overall system capabilities.

1.2 The robotic system includes a remote pilot in control of most functionality, so an onboard camera and remote pilot display are typically required. This test method can be used to evaluate assistive or autonomous behaviors intended to improve the effectiveness or efficiency of remotely operated systems.

1.3 Different user communities can set their own thresholds of acceptable performance within this test method for various mission requirements.

1.4 Performing Location—This test method may be performed anywhere the specified apparatuses and environmental conditions can be implemented. Flying unmanned aircraft without a comprehensive understanding of the laws and regulations enforced by the relevant jurisdiction poses significant safety and legal risks. Failure to comply with these regulations may result in accidents, injuries, property damage, and legal consequences. Users of this standard are strongly advised to review and adhere to all applicable ASTM Committee F38 standards and to ensure full compliance with the authorities holding jurisdiction.

1.5 Units—The International System of Units (SI Units) and U.S. Customary Units (Imperial Units) are used throughout this document. They are not mathematical conversions. Rather, they are approximate equivalents in each system of units to enable use of readily available materials in different countries. The differences between the stated dimensions in each system of units are insignificant for the purposes of comparing test method results, so each system of units is separately considered standard within this test method.

1.6 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

1.7 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

Price:
Contact Sales
Related
Reprints and Permissions
Reprints and copyright permissions can be requested through the
Copyright Clearance Center
Details
Book of Standards Volume: 15.08
Developed by Subcommittee: E54.09
Pages: 14
DOI: 10.1520/E3480_E3480M-25