Standard
Historical
Last Updated: Dec 31, 2010
Track Document
ASTM E2536-06
Standard Guide for Assessment of Measurement Uncertainty in Fire Tests
Standard Guide for Assessment of Measurement Uncertainty in Fire Tests
E2536-06
ASTM|E2536-06|en-US
Standard Guide for Assessment of Measurement Uncertainty in Fire Tests
Standard
E2536 Standard Guide for Assessment of Measurement Uncertainty in Fire Tests>
new
BOS Vol. 04.07 Committee E05
$
96.00
In stock
Significance and Use
Users of fire test data often need a quantitative indication of the quality of the data presented in a test report. This quantitative indication is referred to as the “measurement uncertainty”. There are two primary reasons for estimating the uncertainty of fire test results.
5.1.1 ISO/IEC 17025 requires that competent testing and calibration laboratories include uncertainty estimates for the results that are presented in a report.
5.1.2 Fire safety engineers need to know the quality of the input data used in an analysis to determine the uncertainty of the outcome of the analysis.
Scope
1.1 This guide covers the evaluation and expression of uncertainty of measurements of fire test methods developed and maintained by ASTM International, based on the approach presented in the GUM. The use in this process of precision data obtained from a round robin is also discussed.
1.2 Application of this guide is limited to tests that provide quantitative results in engineering units. This includes, for example, methods for measuring the heat release rate of burning specimens based on oxygen consumption calorimetry, such as Test Method E 1354.
1.3 This guide does not apply to tests that provide results in the form of indices or binary results (for example, pass/fail). For example, the uncertainty of the Flame Spread Index obtained according to Test Method E 84 cannot be determined.
1.4 In some cases additional guidance is required to supplement this standard. For example, the expression of uncertainty of heat release rate measurements at low levels requires additional guidance and uncertainties associated with sampling are not explicitly addressed.
1.5 This fire standard cannot be used to provide quantitative measures.